#12973: Cannot copy() instances of GurobiBackend.
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
       Reporter:  e.vaughan                                         |         
Owner:  jason, jkantor
           Type:  defect                                            |        
Status:  needs_review  
       Priority:  minor                                             |     
Milestone:  sage-5.0.1    
      Component:  linear programming                                |    
Resolution:                
       Keywords:  Gurobi, GurobiBackend, MixedIntegerLinearProgram  |   Work 
issues:                
Report Upstream:  N/A                                               |     
Reviewers:                
        Authors:                                                    |     
Merged in:                
   Dependencies:                                                    |      
Stopgaps:                
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------

Comment (by ncohen):

 Helloooooo !!!

 > Thanks Nathann! I am a bit reluctant to upgrade to Sage 5.x to test the
 patch due to the issues with Core2 Duo Macs....

 Ahaha. That's understandable `:-D`
 So the bug happens even when you compile from source ? Scary mac..

 > Also, in my original patch, I *did* have a
 >
 >    {{{cpdef GurobiBackend copy(self)}}}
 >
 > line.... Maybe that bit of the patch didn't apply properly in 5.1?

 OOpps. Yes, probably. I looked at the list of rejected lines and saw so
 many GUROBI -> Gurobi, I probably missed that one.

 > One question: why have you changed copy to be a cdef instead of a cpdef?
 (I used cpdef because that's what GLPKBackend uses (or did in 4.8).)

 Oops, you are right. Actually, cpef functions are functions that can be
 called at either C-level or Python level. Well, it more or less changes
 nothing in this situation, as the code onl calls the copy method from the
 backends at C level. It's actually totally up to you `:-)`

 Nathann

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12973#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to