#12767: Clean up dead links in sage/rings/number_field documentation
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  davidloeffler   |         Owner:  davidloeffler      
           Type:  defect          |        Status:  needs_review       
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.1           
      Component:  number fields   |    Resolution:                     
       Keywords:  sd40.5          |   Work issues:                     
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:  Karl-Dieter Crisman
        Authors:  David Loeffler  |     Merged in:                     
   Dependencies:                  |      Stopgaps:                     
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Changes (by kcrisman):

  * keywords:  => sd40.5
  * reviewer:  => Karl-Dieter Crisman


Comment:

 Comments:
 * I can't give the new code itself positive review, although it seems
 correct (mostly I have questions about the change to `absolute_degree`.
 Maybe that could be moved to a different ticket if one doesn't find a
 reviewer?
 * I can, however, suggest a trivial fix - the second-to-last line below
 had `new_codomain`, not `new_domain` (I'd add a patch, but see the
 previous comment):
 {{{
     def extend_domain(self, new_domain):
         r"""
         INPUT:

         - ``self`` -- a member of Hom(Y, Z)
         - ``new_domain`` -- an object X such that there is a canonical
 coercion
           `\phi` in Hom(X, Y)
 }}}
   Also, maybe we want to just turn that double-underscore attribute into a
 single-underscore attribute?  Here at SD 40.5 that is being suggested
 strongly for any occurrences of such things.
 * In the nearly identical two occurrences of
 {{{
 self.__maximal_order[v] = RelativeOrder(self, abs_order, is_maximal=True,
 check=False)
 }}}
   is it possible that the first one is not supposed to have the `[v]`?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12767#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to