#12839: reduced Groebner basis not unique
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: mariah | Owner: malb
Type: defect | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: commutative algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by john_perry):
* status: new => needs_info
Comment:
Hello
I'm still of the opinion that what I wrote about reduced Groebner bases in
integer rings is correct, given the behavior of Singular and Macaulay2.
That said, the incorrect conclusion that `I != J` is easily fixed, using
the algorithm I outlined. I have uploaded a patch to #12802 that does
precisely this.
Assuming that what I've done there is correct, is there a way to mark this
patch as a duplicate, or something similar?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12839#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
