#8969: problems with maxima inequalities
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: dsm | Owner: burcin
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40.5 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Douglas McNeil | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
The problem wasn't really our translation of Maxima's inequality (`#`,
which we finally fixed a while ago) but rather that we then had this
little hack already.
But all of your tests already work in Sage 5.0, because of the `#`
replacement. It really has to test the original bug report example,
otherwise this is trivial. I suggest
{{{
sage: from sage.calculus.calculus import
symbolic_expression_from_maxima_string as sefms
sage: sefms("x != 3") == SR(x != 3)
True
sage: sefms("x # 3") == SR(x != 3)
True
sage: solve([2*x==3, x != 5], x)
[[x == (3/2), (-7/2) != 0]]
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8969#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
