#9260: missing pointer in documentation
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: zimmerma | Owner: mvngu
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Karl-Dieter Crisman | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by {'newvalue': u'Karl-Dieter Crisman', 'oldvalue': ''}):
* status: new => needs_review
* author: => Karl-Dieter Crisman
Comment:
I see what you were asking now in comment:3. Most Sage documentation now
has these hyperlinks, but it does mean one has to ignore the backticks and
things like `:class` or `:meth:`. I think this is standard now.
{{{
sage.rings.real_mpfi.RealIntervalField_class?
}}}
is the correct command, and the patch coming up changes the doc so that
this can at least be found, modulo the extra formatting.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9260#comment:5>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
