#12977: Let singular_function expect "attributes" not as a dict
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: malb
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: commutative algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: sd40.5 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Mike Hansen
Authors: Simon King | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Changes (by robertwb):
* status: needs_review => needs_work
Comment:
a_attrib will be defined after any non-empty loop even if it doesn't break
with a match
I think that this interface is rather subtle, I'd rather have a
compare_using_identiy=[True|False] keyword in the function (which will
iterate over the dictionary rather than indexing into it). On that note,
is indexing ever safe (do equal ideals always hash the same?)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12977#comment:9>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
