#13057: introspection is slow
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------
       Reporter:  bober                     |         Owner:  mvngu   
           Type:  defect                    |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major                     |     Milestone:  sage-5.1
      Component:  documentation             |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:  regression introspection  |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A                       |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:                            |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:                            |      Stopgaps:          
--------------------------------------------+-------------------------------

Comment (by bober):

 > So, it seems much time is spent in the function "format". Has there been
 a change to that function recently? Or am I misinterpreting the figures (I
 am not sure if "cumtime" and "percall" include the time for calling sub-
 functions).

 I'm not entirely sure what the output means either. This reminded me that
 there is some
 other information that I should have added, though. {{{gcd?}}} seems to
 take a good deal
 longer than {{{sage.misc.sageinspect.sage_getdoc(gcd)}}}, which already
 takes way too long. (On my machine is it about 2 seconds for the question
 mark, and about .5 seconds for the direct function call.)

 I had thought that most of the time taken by
 sage.misc.sageinspect.sage_getdoc might be taken up by
 sage.misc.sagedoc.detex, but that doesn't show up in the above at all, and
 I don't know what explains the extra 1.5 seconds.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13057#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to