#13058: Hall-Janko Graph
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: ncohen
| Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: graph theory
| Resolution:
Keywords:
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers:
Authors: Nathann Cohen, Dima Pasechnik
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #12942, #12945, #12952, #12971, #12980, #12981, #12982,
#12989, #13038 | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by kini):
Thanks! Here's a reviewer patch.
For future reference, if you have a long string literal which you want to
split into pieces, you can do it by just placing the strings next to each
other separated by whitespace:
{{{#!python
>>> "a" "b" == "ab"
True
}}}
This is actually more efficient than writing `"a" + "b"`, because it is
parsed directly as "ab", whereas with `"a" + "b"`, Python first creates
two string objects `"a"` and `"b"`, and then concatenates them together
into a new string object `"ab"``, which essentially causes two useless
objects to be created.
I decreased the indentation of some lines in the doctest by two spaces
because later, once David Roe's work at #12415 fixes #10458, the `...` can
be replaced with `....:` (two characters more) without making the indent
excessively wide.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13058#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
