#13067: is_strongly_regular
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: ncohen
| Owner: jason, ncohen, rlm
Type: enhancement
| Status: new
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: graph theory
| Resolution:
Keywords:
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers:
Authors:
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #12942, #12945, #12952, #12971, #12980, #12981, #12982,
#12989, #13038, #13058 | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by ncohen):
Replying to [comment:4 kini]:
> The triple you return is not in itself a proof of anything.
Yep. That's why I agree that it is improper, however it may still be
better to use the same keyword as usual. I'll conform to your advice, so
tell me what you think is best.
There is also this is_isomorphic(certify = True) and this
automorphism_group(translation = True) that I do not like much `:-)`
Nathann
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13067#comment:6>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
