#12449: Improve the way that sage evaluates symbolic functions on basic types
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: bober | Owner: bober
Type: enhancement | Status:
positive_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: symbolics | Resolution:
Keywords: gamma function | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Burcin
Erocal, Jonathan Bober
Authors: Jonathan Bober, Burcin Erocal | Merged in:
Dependencies: #4498, #12507, #9130 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Changes (by bober):
* status: needs_review => positive_review
Comment:
Ok, after a brief discussion at SD 40.5 (after Jeroen went to sleep and
wasn't there to complain) I'm restoring this to positive review. A few
people seemed to agree that if a function is called on a machine floating
point type then it is reasonable for it to give machine dependent answers.
I hope that all the tests actually pass now. Also, I've twice updated the
patch to remove trailing whitespace, so I hope that I actually got it all
this time.
(Of course, Jeroen will still have an opportunity to object...)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12449#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
