#9774: Upgrade the notebook to use MathJax instead of jsMath
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: mpatel
| Owner: jason, was
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_work
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.2
Component: notebook
| Resolution:
Keywords:
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers: Jason Grout, John Palmieri, Punarbasu Purkayastha,
Keshav Kini
Authors: Rob Beezer, Davide Cervone, John Palmieri, Jason Grout,
Nathan Carter | Merged in:
Dependencies: #11080
| Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Changes (by jhpalmieri):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
We have doctest failures:
{{{
sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sagenb-
main/sagenb/notebook/jsmath.py # 5 doctests failed
sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sagenb-
main/sagenb/misc/sphinxify.py # 1 doctests failed
sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/de/tutorial/latex.rst #
27 doctests failed
sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/latex.rst #
27 doctests failed
sage -t --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix0.pyx # 1
doctests failed
}}}
The problem with sphinxify is easy to fix. Should we delete jsmath.py, or
is it still needed for something?
The problems with the tutorial are a bit more involved, since (a) it
explicitly discusses using JSMath and (b) I don't speak German.
I don't understand the matrix0.pyx problem at all, at least not yet.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9774#comment:74>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
