#853: Add a pslq implementation to Sage
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: was | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_info
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-wishlist
Component: number theory | Resolution:
Keywords: | Work issues: need advice
on interface
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: David Kirkby
Authors: Paul Zimmermann, Alex Ghitza | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
------------------------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by hivert):
Replying to [comment:21 zimmerma]:
> Replying to [comment:20 hivert]:
> > How much work would that be to interface your C code with Sage ? Do
you have a proof of concept ?
>
> no idea. Why do you ask? See comment [comment:2]. I see no reason to
interface PSLQ.
I'm at a small workshop and there is someone which is currently using
Maple and is considering to switch to Sage.. Maple has both LLL and PSLQ.
He told me that, he has some stability problem with LLL, in the sense that
removing some precision digits gives drastically different results.
Apparently PSLQ doesn't. I've no idea if it's a problem with the
algorithms or the implementation.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/853#comment:22>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
