#13103: Makes BooleanPolynomial more compatible with MPolynomial
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  Bouillaguet          |         Owner:  malb           
           Type:  enhancement          |        Status:  positive_review
       Priority:  minor                |     Milestone:  sage-5.2       
      Component:  commutative algebra  |    Resolution:                 
       Keywords:  polybori             |   Work issues:                 
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:  Martin Albrecht
        Authors:  Charles Bouillaguet  |     Merged in:                 
   Dependencies:                       |      Stopgaps:                 
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Description changed by Bouillaguet:

Old description:

> BooleanPolynomial misses some basic function (e.g., p.is_univariate())
>
> The class BooleanPolynomial, which is in fact a polybori interface, has a
> somewhat different interface compared to the "normal" MPolynomial. This
> is probably not normal. Because of this, the variety() function fails on
> ideals of BooleanPolynomial, which primarily exist to make this
> particular function faster...

New description:

 !BooleanPolynomial misses some basic function (e.g., p.is_univariate())

 The class !BooleanPolynomial, which is in fact a polybori interface, has a
 somewhat different interface compared to the "normal" !MPolynomial. This
 is probably not normal. Because of this, the variety() function fails on
 ideals of !BooleanPolynomial, which primarily exist to make this
 particular function faster...

--

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13103#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to