#12950: update to Pynac 0.2.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
       Reporter:  burcin                                                        
                    |         Owner:  burcin                                    
      
           Type:  defect                                                        
                    |        Status:  closed                                    
      
       Priority:  major                                                         
                    |     Milestone:  sage-5.1                                  
      
      Component:  symbolics                                                     
                    |    Resolution:  fixed                                     
      
       Keywords:  pynac sd40.5                                                  
                    |   Work issues:                                            
      
Report Upstream:  N/A                                                           
                    |     Reviewers:  Jean-Pierre Flori, Burcin Erocal, 
Benjamin Jones
        Authors:  Volker Braun, Burcin Erocal, Jean-Pierre Flori, Titus 
Nicolae, Alexei Sheplyakov  |     Merged in:  sage-5.1.beta2                    
              
   Dependencies:                                                                
                    |      Stopgaps:                                            
      
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Comment (by kcrisman):

 Replying to [comment:20 benjaminfjones]:
 > While updating #11143 I ran into the following issue which occurs when
 the patches here and the new pynac spkg are installed:
 >
 > {{{
 > sage: integral(e^(-x)*log(x+1), x, 0, oo)
 > ...
 > ValueError: Computation failed since Maxima requested additional
 constraints; using the 'assume' command before integral evaluation *may*
 help (example of legal syntax is 'as
 > sume(Infinity>0)', see `assume?` for more details)
 > Is  Infinity  positive, negative, or zero?
 > }}}
 >
 > It looks like there is something going on with the conversion of `oo` to
 `inf` in maxima.
 >
 > ----
 >
 > Another comment: why are the instances of `Infinity` in the doctest
 patches here changed to `infinity`. Isn't the upper case `Infinity` the
 "canonical" Sage infinity?

 Did you want to open a ticket about these, or was this just a point of
 clarification?

 ----

 On an unrelated note, I'm a little confused as to why all the patches
 ended up here.  I understand that this is convenient, but what happens
 then is that a whole bunch of tickets are closed as "sage-invalid/dup" and
 really they weren't dups at all, they just happened to be fixed by this
 spkg.

 At any rate, I recommend making sure that such tickets (like #11423,
 #9547, #12303) are given a normal milestone - even though the fix is here,
 that didn't make the ticket and its authors/reviewers less valid somehow.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12950#comment:24>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to