#13176: Upgrade sage-mode to 0.7
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Reporter: kcrisman | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.2
Component: user interface | Resolution:
Keywords: sage-mode | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
Old description:
> There is a little confusion about the latest sage-mode - see, for
> example, [http://ask.sagemath.org/question/1567/sage-mode-does-not-work
> this ask.sagemath.org question]. On the more or less official
> [http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode wiki page], it is definitely at 0.7,
> but on the optional spkg page (and when downloading via `sage -i sage-
> mode` one only gets 0.6. This needs an upgrade.
>
> #1861 and #2666 are related, but ancient. The SPKG.txt should at least
> be updated a little; maybe #1861's concern about making the inheritance
> from ipython.el should be dealt with here as well.
New description:
There is a little confusion about the latest sage-mode - see, for example,
[http://ask.sagemath.org/question/1567/sage-mode-does-not-work this
ask.sagemath.org question]. On the more or less official
[http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode wiki page], it is definitely at 0.7,
but on the optional spkg page (and when downloading via `sage -i sage-
mode` one only gets 0.6. This needs an upgrade.
#1861 and #2666 are related, but ancient. The SPKG.txt should at least be
updated a little.
--
Comment (by kcrisman):
#1861's issues have already been dealt with on the
[http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode wiki], which is more or less official,
so that is good now.
The spkg is located [http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-
mode?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=sage-mode-0.7.spkg here]. I see that
0.8 has all the other good changes mentioned at #1861 and elsewhere.
A question about the 0.8 spkg, though perhaps that doesn't belong here:
{{{
$ hg st
? emacs/sage-load.el
}}}
Ivan, do you think the goal of this ticket should be 0.7 on the optional
spkg? If so, then since Nick wrote it, you can review it. For 0.8,
though, you'd have to find someone else to review it, and that could take
a while. I recommend the former course. In that case we can open another
ticket for 0.8, where all these doc issues are 100% taken care of, I
already given positive review to that stuff and the spkg qua spkg (well,
except for the thing above!).
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13176#comment:3>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
