#13100: EllipticCurve_from_j (over QQ) should not always compute minimal twist
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Reporter: cremona | Owner: cremona
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.2
Component: elliptic curves | Resolution:
Keywords: elliptic curve construction | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: David Roe
Authors: John Cremona | Merged in:
Dependencies: #13109 | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------------------+----------------------------
Old description:
> Currently when constructing an elliptic curve from a j-invariant over QQ,
> a curve with minimal conductor is created (the so-called "minimal
> twist"). This could be expensive since it involves factoring j and
> j-1728, so an option to *not* find the minimal twist should be allowed,
> with the current behaviour as default for backwards compatibility.
>
> For example:
> {{{
> sage: EllipticCurve(j=2^256+1)
> }}}
> currently triggers factorization of {{{F_8}}} (which is quite quick) but
> also {{{F_8-1728}}} (which is not).
>
> Apply [attachment:trac13100-elliptic.patch] and [attachment:trac13100
> -rebase-on-13109.patch].
New description:
Currently when constructing an elliptic curve from a j-invariant over QQ,
a curve with minimal conductor is created (the so-called "minimal twist").
This could be expensive since it involves factoring j and j-1728, so an
option to *not* find the minimal twist should be allowed, with the current
behaviour as default for backwards compatibility.
For example:
{{{
sage: EllipticCurve(j=2^256+1)
}}}
currently triggers factorization of {{{F_8}}} (which is quite quick) but
also {{{F_8-1728}}} (which is not).
Apply [attachment:trac13100-elliptic-rebased.patch].
--
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
Sorry, try this one instead. (I got this one confused with another ticket
dealing with elliptic curves.)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13100#comment:11>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
