#10637: Implement sage -sws2rst
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------
       Reporter:  nthiery                                   |         Owner:  
jason, mpatel, was                                             
           Type:  enhancement                               |        Status:  
needs_review                                                   
       Priority:  major                                     |     Milestone:  
sage-5.2                                                       
      Component:  notebook                                  |    Resolution:    
                                                             
       Keywords:  ReST, worksheet                           |   Work issues:    
                                                             
Report Upstream:  Workaround found; Bug reported upstream.  |     Reviewers:  
Nicolas ThiƩry, Jason Grout, Karl-Dieter Crisman, Jason Bandlow
        Authors:  Pablo Angulo, Karl-Dieter Crisman         |     Merged in:    
                                                             
   Dependencies:  #11080, #11459                            |      Stopgaps:    
                                                             
------------------------------------------------------------+---------------

Comment (by pang):

 Thanks again, Karl. I will address most comments later, after some
 experiment, but I'd love to hear your opinion on one of them. You said:

 Replying to [comment:59 kcrisman]:
 > * In results sections, is all html being removed?  Is there a reason for
 this?  I assume that this is to take care of a specific type of result
 that can occur that I can't think of right now.  After all, a Sage cell is
 a Python cell, and html certainly could be legitimate output.

 What should I do? I don't feel like parsing it into rst, because it's
 output, and parsing is lossy. I cannot be too literal either, because I
 have to leave something that works when the rst files are rendered into
 html, tex or whatever.

 The question is related to others, like the one on tracebacks for example.
 I didn't like long tracebacks in the docs, which would scare my non-
 technical prospective readers. Should I rewrite sws2rst to incorporate
 several config options, like long_tracebacks or parse_html_in_results or
 replace_monospace_font_by_code_tags? Can you think of others?

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10637#comment:60>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to