#7160: comparison with quadratic number field elements needs work
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Reporter: mhansen | Owner: davidloeffler
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.1
Component: number fields | Resolution:
Keywords: sd35 | Work issues: doctest failures
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Mike Hansen, Burcin Erocal | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Comment (by vdelecroix):
Hi,
I made a sort of duplicate with #13213. My aim was to use the natural
order of RR in the case of real embedding. For quadratic field it is quite
easy and fast. In the same patch, I aim to implement other functions
related to the real embedding (is_positive, floor, ceil, abs, ...).
On the other hand, the difference of timings with my patch have an order
of magnitude of x10 and not of x1000.
Should I close my ticket ? What to do with my patch ?
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7160#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
