#12922: Implicit derivative
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Reporter: mmarco | Owner: burcin
Type: enhancement | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: calculus | Resolution:
Keywords: implicit derivative | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Miguel Marco | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
Comment (by kcrisman):
Yes, both helpful! A few comments.
* The reviewer patch should be a separate patch on top of the original
patch, so that the original author is kept.
* In any case, the patch should have a meaningful commit message.
* I'm a little apprehensive about the many specific variables and
functions defined here. Won't that cause some kind of conflict with (say)
an already-defined `yy`? We shouldn't depend on people not needing those
variables. Or is everything only in local scope because of the use of
`SR.symbol`?
I'm also wondering - is it possible to have an implicit derivative method
for symbolic expressions? Just curious.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12922#comment:4>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
