#13202: conversion problems in BooleanPolynomialRing with degrevlex order
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
Reporter: Bouillaguet | Owner: malb
Type: defect | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.2
Component: commutative algebra | Resolution:
Keywords: conversion | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Martin Albrecht
Authors: Alexander Dreyer, Charles Bouillaguet | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
---------------------------------------------------------+------------------
Comment (by Bouillaguet):
So, I don't exactly understand what the plan is. The patch, even though it
fixes the problem at the origin of this ticket, does not fixes all
problems:
- m.index() exposes the hack behind the current implementation of
degreglex
- Alexander seems to believe that there is a problem with variables()
So, do we want to remove the degrevlex from BooleanPolynomialRing
altogether, and instruct users to use the newly implemented degneglex
instead, or do we want to actually support degrevlex? (and how?)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13202#comment:15>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
