#11563: Make lrcalc a standard package
-------------------------------------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: nthiery | Owner:
sage-combinat
Type: enhancement | Status:
needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone:
sage-5.2
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: lrcalc, symmetric functions, days38 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Anne
Schilling, Jeroen Demeyer
Authors: Nicolas M. Thiéry | Merged in:
Dependencies: #10333 | Stopgaps:
-------------------------------------------------------+--------------------
Comment (by jhpalmieri):
Since the binaries are no longer installed, the test suite for the package
fails (that is, running `sage -i -c lrcalc...`):
{{{
Successfully installed lrcalc-1.1.6beta1
Running the test suite for lrcalc-1.1.6beta1...
Making check in mathlib
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'.
Making check in lrcoef
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'.
Making check in schubert
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `check'.
make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
make -j2 check-TESTS
make[2]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
-n testing lrcoef/lrcoef 3 2 1 - 2 1 - 2 1 ...
ok
-n testing lrcoef/skew 3 2 1 - 2 1 ...
ok
-n testing lrcoef/skew -r 2 3 2 1 / 2 1 ...
ok
-n testing lrcoef/mult 2 1 - 2 1 ...
ok
./testsuite: line 7: mult: command not found
-n testing mult -f 3,2 3 2 1 - 3 2 1 ...
failed:
Expected: 1 (4, 4, 4)
1 (5, 4, 3)
Got:
./testsuite: line 7: mult: command not found
-n testing mult -q 3,2 3 2 1 - 3 2 1 ...
failed:
Expected: 1 (2)
1 (1, 1)
Got:
-n testing lrcoef/coprod 3 2 1 ...
ok
-n testing schubert/schubmult 1 3 2 - 1 3 2 ...
ok
FAIL: testsuite
=======================================================
1 of 1 test failed
Please report to asbuch at math dot rutgers period edu
=======================================================
}}}
Otherwise, all tests passed for me on hawk also, and on OS X 10.7. I think
that since this had a positive review before, if you can fix spkg-check so
self-tests pass, then it should get a positive review.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11563#comment:39>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
