#13284: Some conversion between BooleanPolynomialRing and GF(2)[.....] are 
missing
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
   Reporter:  Bouillaguet          |             Owner:  malb      
       Type:  defect               |            Status:  new       
   Priority:  minor                |         Milestone:  sage-5.3  
  Component:  commutative algebra  |          Keywords:  conversion
Work issues:                       |   Report Upstream:  N/A       
  Reviewers:                       |           Authors:            
  Merged in:                       |      Dependencies:            
   Stopgaps:                       |  
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
 For some reason, it is impossible to directly build the (standard
 benchmark) cyclic ideals over !BooleanPolynomialRing
 {{{
 sage: from sage.rings.ideal import Cyclic
 sage: R = BooleanPolynomialRing(10, 'x')
 sage: I = Cyclic(R)
 ***BOOOM***
 ....
 TypeError: cannot convert <type
 'sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_libsingular.MPolynomial_libsingular'>
 to BooleanPolynomial
 }}}

 Note that there is a possible workaround:
 {{{
 sage: R = BooleanPolynomialRing(10, 'x')
 sage: R2 = PolynomialRing(GF(2), 10, 'x')
 sage: I = ideal([ R(f) for f in Cyclic(R2).gens()])
 }}}

 Note that from a mathematical point of view, this is not a very
 interesting example since this ideal is rather trivial in the boolean
 polynomial ring... yet something is wrong...

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13284>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to