#13237: Upgrade Singular
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------
       Reporter:  jdemeyer        |         Owner:  tbd     
           Type:  enhancement     |        Status:  new     
       Priority:  major           |     Milestone:  sage-5.3
      Component:  packages        |    Resolution:          
       Keywords:  Singular spkg   |   Work issues:          
Report Upstream:  N/A             |     Reviewers:          
        Authors:  Jeroen Demeyer  |     Merged in:          
   Dependencies:                  |      Stopgaps:          
----------------------------------+-----------------------------------------

Comment (by leif):

 I assume that this is work in progress (i.e., you haven't tried to fix
 doctest errors yet).

 Anyway, here's what I got on Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS x86_64, with Sage 5.2.rc0
 and GCC 4.7.0:
 {{{
 The following tests failed:

         sage -t  --long -force_lib
 devel/sage/doc/en/constructions/polynomials.rst # 1 doctests failed
         sage -t  --long -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/rings/function_field/function_field.py # 1 doctests failed
         sage -t  --long -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx # 3
 doctests failed
         sage -t  --long -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py # 1 doctests
 failed
         sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/calculus/wester.py # 1
 doctests failed
         sage -t  --long -force_lib
 devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx # 2 doctests failed
         sage -t  --long -force_lib devel/sage/sage/combinat/words/words.py
 # 0 doctests failed
 }}}
 (The last failure was a segfault with a large traceback IIRC.  Somewhat
 surprisingly successfully compiled with `-O3`, although many if not most
 compile commands override this by `-O2`; looks as if they use `CPPFLAGS`
 ''instead of'' `CXXFLAGS` in some parts.)

 Let me know in case you're interested in further output; I guess you can
 reproduce most of the errors.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13237#comment:10>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to