#13312: Polyhedral bugfixes and improvements
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mhampton | Owner: mhampton
Type: defect | Status: needs_review
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: geometry | Resolution:
Keywords: polyhedra, polar | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers:
Authors: Marshall Hampton, Volker Braun | Merged in:
Dependencies: #11763 | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by mhampton):
I'd really like to have the functionality of the face_dual_descriptions
method. I disagree that your docstring is really a one-liner, and I don't
think that would be very easy for Sage/Python newbies to figure out. I
have talked to a couple of people who would like a platform for polyhedral
computation who have tried Sage and find it very difficult to accomplish
what they would like to do. So I think perhaps we could add your
faces(dim) method and an improved version of the face_dual_descriptions
method which could return a tuple instead of a list if that makes you
happier.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13312#comment:7>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
