#13399: Fixes to symmetric functions
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  aschilling           |         Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  defect               |        Status:  new          
       Priority:  major                |     Milestone:  sage-5.4     
      Component:  combinatorics        |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  symmetric functions  |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:  Mike Zabrocki
        Authors:  Anne Schilling       |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:                       |      Stopgaps:               
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Speaking of fixes/improvements for symmetric functions: the current code
 is not perfectly consistent for the naming of the bases:
 {{{
 sage: S = SymmetricFunctions(QQ['q,t'].fraction_field())
 sage: S.s()
 Symmetric Function Algebra over Fraction Field of Multivariate Polynomial
 Ring in q, t over Rational Field, Schur symmetric functions as basis
 sage: S.macdonald().P()
 Symmetric Functions over Fraction Field of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in
 q, t over Rational Field in the realization MacdonaldPolynomials_p
 }}}

 And indeed in the code, S.s()._repr_ comes from
 SymmetricFunctionAlgebra_classical, where as
 S.macdonald().P()._repr_ comes from generic with_realization code.

 What about moving (in this ticket, or later), the _repr_ from
 SymmetricFunctionAlgebra_classical to SymmetricFunctionsBases?

 A bit of fiddling with ._basis might be needed to get the string
 'Macdonald P symmetric functions' right, but this should not be too bad.

 Cheers,
                        Nicolas

 PS: as a side effect, this would help me a bit with my functorial
 construction patch, as it currently breaks the naming of the
 macdo/llt/hl basis, and would not anymore with the changes above.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13399#comment:2>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to