#13259: Correcting implementation of "negative" quantum integers
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Reporter: andrew.mathas | Owner: andrew.mathas
Type: defect | Status: needs_work
Priority: minor | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: combinatorics | Resolution:
Keywords: quantum integer | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: arminstraub, nthiery
Authors: Andrew Mathas | Merged in:
Dependencies: | Stopgaps:
-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------
Changes (by jdemeyer):
* status: positive_review => needs_work
Comment:
There is a problem building the documentation:
{{{
release/merger/sage-5.4.beta0/local/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/sage/combinat/q_analogues.py:docstring of
sage.combinat.q_analogues.q_factorial:18: WARNING: Literal block expected;
none found.
}}}
Have a look gain at the documentation of `q_factorial`, lines 80--82.
Reviewers: please put your ''real name'' in the Reviewer field.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13259#comment:14>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
