#6538: bug in Partitions
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reporter: jhpalmieri | Owner: mhansen
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.3
Component: combinatorics | Resolution: fixed
Keywords: partitions, days38 | Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A | Reviewers: Benjamin Jones
Authors: Travis Scrimshaw | Merged in: sage-5.3.beta2
Dependencies: #12925 | Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Comment (by nthiery):
Replying to [comment:17 jhpalmieri]:
> If you're still looking for something that gives the wrong answer, use
`parts_in`:
> {{{
> sage: [len(p) for p in Partitions(10, length=6, parts_in=[1,2])]
> [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]
> sage: Partitions(10, parts_in=[1,2]).cardinality() == Partitions(10,
length=6, parts_in=[1,2]).cardinality()
> True
> }}}
> Another ticket?
>
> Edit: I guess this is #12278.)
Yup: I copy pasted this example as a comment in #12278!
However, I was looking for an example giving wrong results while only
using the IntegerListsLex engine (i.e. without parts_in). Thanks though
:-)
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6538#comment:18>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
