#13404: Improved printing for symmetric function bases and misc refactoring
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
       Reporter:  nthiery              |         Owner:  sage-combinat
           Type:  enhancement          |        Status:  needs_review 
       Priority:  major                |     Milestone:  sage-5.4     
      Component:  combinatorics        |    Resolution:               
       Keywords:  symmetric functions  |   Work issues:               
Report Upstream:  N/A                  |     Reviewers:               
        Authors:  Nicolas M. ThiƩry    |     Merged in:               
   Dependencies:  #13399               |      Stopgaps:               
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment (by nthiery):

 Hi Anne,

 Replying to [comment:12 aschilling]:
 > I looked over the patch and overall it looks very good to me. Thanks,
 Nicolas, for making these changes!

 You are welcome!

 > Just a quick questions: so this is now consistent with NSym and QSym,
 right?

 Yes! Well, almost: there remains the on->in change for NSym and Qsym
 (and in general "with realizations"), but that's for another patch.

 > Don't you want to keep some tests when q is set to a value or both
 parameters are set to a value?

 That would have been better indeed. That being said, the doctests of
 SymmetricFunctionsBases.ParentMethods._repr_ includes an example with
 two parameters, and the failure when q is wrong is tested in
 Macdonald.__init__; so if you don't mind I'll be lazy and leave things
 as is.

 > Also, where is zee specified in this code?
 {{{
         1519        def _dual_basis_default(self):
         1520            ...
         1548            return self.dual_basis(scalar=zee, scalar_name =
 "Hall scalar product")
                                                       ^^^ Here ?
 }}}

 > Other than these questions I am happy to set a positive review!

 Thanks!

 Cheers,
                  Nicolas

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13404#comment:13>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to