#5457: Refactor symmetric functions and k-bounded subspace
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reporter: nthiery
| Owner: mhansen
Type: enhancement
| Status: needs_review
Priority: major
| Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: combinatorics
| Resolution:
Keywords: symmetric functions, days38, sd40
| Work issues:
Report Upstream: N/A
| Reviewers: Dan Bump, Nicolas M. ThiƩry
Authors: Mike Zabrocki, Anne Schilling, Jason Bandlow, Jeroen Demeyer
| Merged in:
Dependencies: #11563, #13109, #12969
| Stopgaps:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Comment (by aschilling):
Replying to [comment:73 jdemeyer]:
> Replying to [comment:70 zabrocki]:
> > Just an FYI, this does not seem to be a new bug introduced by this
patch.
> What do you mean? The doctest is testing code which did not exist
before. So I would say the bug was introduced by this patch.
The failures are related to failures that already existed before this
patch.
On sage 5.0.1 (plain) one obtains
{{{
sage: LLTHSpin(QQ,3,t=2)
LLT polynomials in the HSp basis at level 3 with t=2 over Rational Field
sage: H = LLTHSpin(QQ,3,t=2)
sage: s = SFASchur(QQ)
sage: s(H([2,1]))
ERROR: An unexpected error occurred while tokenizing input
The following traceback may be corrupted or invalid
The error message is: ('EOF in multi-line statement', (1760, 0))
}}}
Anne
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5457#comment:75>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.