#13435: Cartesian Product method for Sets
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: chrisjamesberg | Owner: Chris Berg
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-5.4
Component: PLEASE CHANGE | Keywords: Cartesian Product for sets
Work issues: | Report Upstream: N/A
Reviewers: | Authors: Chris Berg
Merged in: | Dependencies:
Stopgaps: |
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Right now, Sets has a method CartesianProduct (not to be confused with
cartesian_product). The documentation says that this is the class for
implementing cartesian_product. Does this belong as a method in the global
namespace for sets? I can't think why the user would want this method to
come up, when all it says is to use cartesian_product instead.
For instance:
{{{
S = Set([1,2])
S.CartesianProduct(S)
Traceback (click to the left of this block for traceback)
...
TypeError: __init__() takes at least 3 arguments (2 given)
}}}
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13435>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
