Tergantung underwriternya!!!! Oversub Ƙªƍα jelas ukurannya...kl ΰðaћ di psr
sekunder ya tergantung BANDAR....
-SalaM Cuannnnn Selaluuuuuuu,,,-
¤ Bryand ¤
Powered by RyanBerry®,, Signalnya Cuannnn terusssss......
-----Original Message-----
From: "artique" <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 03:36:40
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: [saham] Re: MBTO overscrub 52x ??? masa sih ????
Saya ingin memberitahu bahwa Oversubscribe suatu saham pada waktu bookbuilding
itu bisa "diatur" :)
Jadi jgn dijadikan patokan bagus ato tidaknya suatu emiten.
--- In [email protected], cuanesia@... wrote:
>
> Nonton mnc bizz kemarin, kata salahsatu suhu teknikal kita sih krn kebanyakan
> yg beli ipo mbto adl retail, ini dikarenakan marcapnya yg kecil shg kurang
> menarik bg fund manager, shg saat harga2 turun retailer panik, dan tdk ada yg
> ngejagain harga sehingga saat ditekan dikit harga langsung turun banyak.Dan
> juga dia masuk pasar di timing yg salah, saat isu inflasi lg ngetrend, shg
> otomatis produknya yg berjenis consumer ikut tertekan. :)
> Sent from my AXIS Worry Free BlackBerry® smartphone
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Budi Herbudi <budiherbudi@...>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:10:05
> To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [saham] Re: MBTO overscrub 52x ??? masa sih ????
>
> Ngga usah dipikirin deh....gw nyangkut disitu....he he he
>
> Sent from my iPhone®3Gs
> powered by Telkomsel
>
> On 14 Jan 2011, at 10:04, Saham Gorengan <gorengan_saham@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > aneh yaa... katanya overscrub sampe 52x tapi kenapa malah anjlok ???
> > --- On Fri, 1/14/11, artique <artique@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: artique <artique@...>
> > Subject: [saham] Re: MBTO mau dikerek ke brp?
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 2:38 AM
> >
> >
> > Kemungkinan dikerek ke 500 kayanya :)
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Radia <diana.ratu@> wrote:
> > >
> > > MBTO, mau dikerek ke brp?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
