I think this is great. maybe we can talk about this @ the sail meeting. but what does this mean for timeline for authoring and trying to create a concrete editor that can author correct curnits.right now, we are trying to create testing/implentation interations to get authoring working. how does this impact this?
-Tony On 7/25/07, Scott Cytacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Turadg Aleahmad wrote: > > Here at CSCL, Stephen and I have been talking about OTrunk is used in > > SAIL, how Scott's planning to move it onto EMF, and how maybe the same > > tech could be used as the object persistence format in pods. > > > > I've put some notes together on our current design and how we got > > here. I'd really like to get rid of XMLEncoder, or at least this > > assemblyCalls mechanism. Please take a look at this proposal and > > leave any comments, additions or clarifications. > > > > > > > http://www.telscenter.org/confluence/display/SAIL/Proposal+for+pod+model+v2 > > > > Scott, what do you think? > I agree getting rid of the assembly mechanism is a must. > > If we are considering moving to OTrunk/EMF, then I don't think it makes > sense to do some intermediate replacement of XMLEncoder. A change like > this in any form will affect many parts of Sail/Pas, so doing it twice > will really slow everyone down. > > The move to OTrunk/EMF will be more fundamental than just redesigning > the Pod system. In OTrunk/EMF there might not be a need to have > something called a Pod. Most of the functionality would be there, it > would just be accomplished by multiple parts of the system working > together. > > My suggestion would be to have a CC developer or a developer who can > spend some time at CC make a prototype version of Pas that runs on > OTrunk. In this case an otml file would be used to configure the > project. I think a mostly functional version of this could be put > together in a few days time. Then we'd have something concrete to > compare with the existing Pas system. > > I think I should focus on finishing the current annotation changes > before moving on to this though. And Aaron needs to focus on another > project for the next month. > I think I or Aaron could do this prototype in late August or early > September. > > If we really need to address this now, I can spend a couple of hours > before the SAIL meeting next week and make a skeleton of the > prototype. Then we can discuss that skeleton. > > Scott > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SAIL-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/SAIL-Dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
