Unknown Facets of the Life of Lord Krishna
Sri Sathya Sai Speaks on Krishna
ADVENT OF KRISHNA
Krishna was born on the 20th of July, 3228 years before the Advent of Christ.
If this has to be put in our calendar, it will be in the year Srimukha, month
by the name Shravana, fortnight by the name Bahula, and the day of Ashtami. The
star will be Rohini and the time will be 3:00 a.m. after midnight. If we count
backwards from today, the day on which Krishna gave up His mortal body will
work out at 5078 years. If we want to check this, we see that 3102 B.C. and
1976 (the year in which Discourse was given) add up to 5078 years. Thus, since
the Kali Yuga has started, we have now gone through 5078 years.
SIGNIFICANCE OF HIS NAME
We must understand properly the meaning of the term Krishna. The word has three
meanings. One is “Krishyati Iti Krishnah” (The one who cultivates is Krishna).
What is it that has to be cultivated? The Hridayakshetra (field of the heart).
Krishna cultivates the field of our hearts by removing the weeds of bad
qualities, watering it with love, ploughing it with the use of Sadhana, and
sowing the seeds of devotion. This is how Krishna cultivates out hearts.
The second meaning of the word is: “Karshati Iti Krishnah”. (The one who
attracts is Krishna). Krishna attracts you by His eyes, His speech, His sports,
and by every action of His. By His words, He softens and calms the hearts of
even those filled with hatred and makes them rejoice.
A third meaning of the word Krishna is “Kushyati Iti Krishna” (one who is
always blissful). Krishna was always in a state of bliss. It was because He had
these various qualities, the sage Garga named Him Krishna. The ordinary meaning
of the word Krishna is “one who is dark”. But people think only of this meaning
and forget the deeper and truer meanings of the Lord’s name. The essence of
Krishna’s life is, He proclaimed the Truth to the world, propagated the eternal
verities and delighted the world by His Leelas.
KRISHNA AND GOPIKAS
People forget that Krishna was just 11 years old, when He finally left
Brindavan, the scene of the Rasa Leela, towards Mathura and from thence to
Dwaraka. The Bhagavata itself explicitly says that. But, it is ignored, because
the minds of the people and the poets who want to see sensuality in the
Rasaleela are vitiated by Vishaya Vasana (attachment to sense objects).
It is also stated that Krishna was wedded to 16,000 Gopikas. Who are these
Gopikas? They are not cowherdesses in physical form. In the human head there is
a lotus with a thousand petals. The Lord is described as the embodiment of the
16 Kalas. As the Lord of the Sahasrara (thousand-petalled lotus), He presides
over the 16,000 Kalas which are present in this lotus. The Kundalini Shakti,
which starts at the bottom of the spinal column (Mooladhaara), rises and merges
with the 16,000 entities in the Sahasraara. This is the esoteric significance
and the meaning of the role of the Divine within the body. Oblivious to this
inner meaning, people indulge in misinterpretations and perverse expositions.
THE MASTER ACTOR-DIRECTOR
Is it possible for any ordinary individual to make his appearance
simultaneously in numerous different places? The image of Krishna could appear
in the hearts of the Gopis, though they were far away from Him. What is
necessary is to purify the heart. The image of the Divine will not be reflected
in an impure heart. There is no limit to the power of the Divine. Only the
small-minded have limited power. God alone knows to whom, in what
circumstances, at what time, to what extent and in what form His grace should
be showered.
For example, take the case of Draupadi. In his vast audience-hall Duryodhana
was inflicting humiliation on Draupadi. Unknown and unseen by anyone, Krishna
was giving to Draupadi an endless number of saris. How are ordinary persons
likely to view the situation? They might ask: “How is Krishna tolerating this
kind of disrobing of Draupadi? Why does He not reduce Duryodhana to ashes that
very moment? Why does He not put an end to his life? When the devotees are in
agony, should the Divine merely look on?” The ignorant may tend to react in
this fashion. But the Divine, who is the embodiment of peace, love and truth
has to take note of Kaarana, Karya and Kartavya (the cause, the remedy and the
task to be done). In the great cosmic drama, the Lord is also an actor. The
time should be ripe for the role He has to play in a particular sequence of
events. His action should be appropriate to His role. He cannot act otherwise.
For instance, if Krishna decided to kill Duryodhana at the moment of Draupadi’s
humiliation, He would be going against His role in the play. He has to play His
specific part. Krishna knew that Duryodhana’s end lay in the hands of Bheema
and not in His. It would be against His Dharma if He did what Bheema had to do.
Bheema alone should slay Duryodhana with his mace. This is the law of creation.
Krishna waited for the ordained event.
KRISHNA – THE WAR MONGER OR DIVINE DOCTOR?
The fire of Adharma has spread and taken possession so much that if you want to
remove this fire, the only way that can be done is to have a heavy rain and not
just ordinary drops of shower. Also this rain must be the rain of arrows.
Krishna believed that the battle and this shower of arrows was necessary to
stop the fire of Adharma engulfing the whole world.
The youth of today may get a doubt. Krishna wanted the peace of this world and
yet He encouraged this big battle in which forty lakhs of people were killed.
Is this called Himsa (violence) or Ahimsa (nonviolence)? Even then, Krishna
gave an appropriate answer to this. He said, “Arjuna! Let us take the case of a
cancerous growth on the body. This cancerous growth gives pain to the whole
human body, although the growth itself is confined to a localised area. In that
cancer, you have so many small germs present in the wound. When the doctor
performs an operation on this cancerous growth, he will no doubt kill millions
of germs. He will not think that he is going to kill a million germs and
therefore stop the operation. If he does not perform the operation, the germs
will be saved but the patient will suffer. He will surely kill the disease
causing germs and save the patient”. Krishna further said, “In this body of the
world this is the situation now. The cancer has come in the form of the
Kauravas who are ruling. The whole world has got upset, and a state of anarchy
is prevailing in the world now. There is also a decline of Dharma. All families
who are living peacefully are being broken up. Therefore, I will be the doctor,
with Arjuna as the compounder. I will perform the operation of cancer in the
form of the battle of Mahabharata. In this battle or the operation, 4,000,000
(four million) of disease-causing germs will be killed for the benefit of the
world. Is this bad or is this good for the world?”
Here Krishna is only demonstrating His authority. It is a very difficult matter
to recognise and accept authority. There is a small example for this. In a
hospital you may find a very proficient and capable doctor. He may be a very
reputed person in his field. He comes to a decision that for a particular
person an operation has to be performed at a particular time the next morning.
This will be notified in the notice board and all concerned relatives will be
informed. There is no secret about this. Everybody will know about this and the
patient will be carried into the operation room. The doctor takes him into the
operation room and performs the operation; but due to some misfortune, the
patient dies. As a result of this, the police will not come and arrest the
doctor. In the same context, if two people enter into a quarrel and one of them
inflicts a small wound on the other man with a razor blade, the police will
immediately come and register a case and arrest the man who has caused the
injury. In the second example, the person does not have the authority to
inflict a wound with a razor blade while in the first case; the doctor has the
right to perform the operation, even in public.
Sometimes we interpret and call one of these as a help or a good deed while the
other one is called harm. We take the case of a diabetic patient with a wound
on his hand. The wound may not heal and may spread to the whole body in the
form of gangrene. The doctor will have to come and say that to prevent further
spreading of this; the hand will have to be removed. He will then amputate the
whole hand, and this is a good deed done to the body.
In another case, if there is a lady who is wearing bangles on her hand, a thief
may come and decide to take away the bangles by cutting the hand and taking
away the hand with the bangles. While the thief and the doctor have both done
the same thing, what the thief has done is harm and what the doctor has done is
good.
When there is a young child who unknowingly sets fire to a house, we think that
he has done great harm and we begin to punish him. However, when Hanuman burnt
down the whole of Lanka, which was as prosperous as heaven itself, we not only
did not punish him but we regarded him as a sacred person. The reason for this
is that in the first case something good was burnt down while in the second
case what Hanuman burnt down was the sin itself. He caused injury to the demons
and the Rakshasas while the small boy caused injury to good people.
Thus, in order to remove or promote the demonic qualities in us, we have the
complete right and power. It is in the context of recognising these various
conflicting situations, in order to preach the inner meaning of these
conflicting situations, Krishna gives various instances which will proclaim to
us what good things are. Krishna was a selfless person, and He always desired
the well-being of the human community. In that context, whatever He may have
done was always good, and there was never anything bad in what He did. He
himself conquered many kingdoms, but He never became a king of any of these
kingdoms. He gave those kingdoms to several people.
Whatever He may have done, there was always an inner meaning. All His actions
were directed towards preaching an inner meaning.
The embodiment of Dharma in the human form of Krishna was one who desired the
well-being of the entire humanity. The true interpretation of Dharma is to ask
for the well-being of the entire human community in the universe. In this
context, you may begin to argue that Krishna Himself behaved as if He wanted to
like some people and favour some people and dislike other people. But the
situations were such that Krishna, who was all-knowing, had to make the
determination of taking a certain line of action. We should look back and see
what Krishna said when Arjuna, in a state of great despondency, refused to go
to battle against his own kinsmen, kill them, see their blood and yet become a
ruler. Krishna told Arjuna, “I am giving the future of Dhritarashtra and his
family. Listen to it. He has one hundred sons but they are all selfish. There
is no place for selfishness in this world, and all these must be killed. Even
though Dhritarashtra had one hundred sons, there will not be even a single son
left to perform the obsequies for him when he dies. Good or bad, Punya (merit)
or Paapa (sin) are not something which others will give you. These are simply
direct results of whatever actions we perform”. What Krishna said and agreed to
was that under such circumstances, to fight a battle was the right kind of
Dharma.
Source: Krishna, Chapter 5, Sai Vani: Avatar on Avatar Purushas, Publications
Division, Sri Sathya Sai Students and Staff Welfare Society, Prasanthi Nilayam
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"saimsg" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
