Dear Saligao-netters,

Please find given below an article in todays Navhind Times on, 'Mobile Tower 
Radiations' by Mr. Shantaram Naik, which makes for interesting reading.

Regards,
Desmond da Costa.

Mobile tower radiations: no adverse health effects have been established

Goa is a peculiar state where there is a lot of resistance from local bodies. 
In fact, the question pertains to towers not being allowed and being given NoCs 
by panchayats in Goa. I have 17 cases of BSNL alone in different parts of Goa 
where local bodies have opposed this. I think the issue is that there is a 
public perception problem with regard to radiation” 

Milind Deora, 

Union Minister of State for Communications 


Wrong public perception
BY SHANTARAM NAIK

Do mobile towers pose a health hazard? This has been a live issue in Goa for 
quite some time. In rest of the country, it has not yet become an issue of 
magnitude but in bigger cities, it has certainly become a sensitive issue.

In the recently concluded session of Rajya Sabha, I had a star question on the 
subject and, the Union Minister of State for Communications, Mr Milind Deora 
who had come well prepared, gave a detailed reply. Members like Mr S S 
Ahluwalia, Mr Chandan Mitra, both of BJP, also asked their pointed 
suplementaries.

I said that today mobile has become our doctor, our computer, our bank, our 
post office, our railway office and our airport. I therefore sought to know 
from the minister whether there is any truth in the reports that radiation from 
towers lead to cancer, that they affect birds and animals, are harmful to the 
pregnant women and children, and further, I wanted to know whether even the DNA 
of the human being is affected due to radiations from the towers.

In his reply Mr Deora said: “The thing is that in India today, with 75 per cent 
of tele-density figures, 72 per cent of that is wireless which is mobile 
telephony and, about 3 per cent of that is wire line. So, the country has 
chosen wireless technology as the preferred choice of communication.”

“But, in terms of radiation, I would like to inform the House and the members 
in particular that the WHO itself has, as recently as 2006-2010, conducted many 
studies. In 2010 the WHO has stated that a large number of studies have been 
conducted over the last two decades to assess whether mobile phone radiation 
from towers pose a potential risk. To date, no adverse health effects have been 
established. One global independent body which is an independent body, called 
ICNIRP (International Convention for Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection) that 
sets the standards for how much radiation is permissible, what is the 
permissible limits from BTSs. I would like to inform the House about a 
chronology of events that have taken place in India. As recently as 2008, the 
government was not adhering to any guidelines relating to the radiation from 
BTSs. In 2008, when we saw this wireless boom in the country, the Indian 
government, the DoT has adopted ICNIRP standards for BTSs mobile towers.”

“In 2010 an enforcement cell was set up which goes out and monitors the 
radiation coming from the towers to build capacity and to go out and enforce 
these. It is only recently that we formed an Inter-Ministerial Committee which 
had members from the DoT, Health Ministry, ICMR, Environment and Forests, 
Bio-technology, Telecom Engineering Centre and Wireless and Planning Centre to 
look at this and at holistic level. Then the Committee suggested to the 
government that we move away from ICNIRP; and increase or reduce the limits by 
one tenth. So, today ICNIRP is effectively adopted by 70 per cent of the world 
in terms of permissible limits for radiation from towers,” he said, adding “We 
moved to a regime which is 10 times more stringent than ICNIRP and that is 
followed by about 10-20 per cent of the world. The government has taken many 
steps to prevent any effect from radiation from mobile towers and also to build 
a capacity. Our Ministry’s goal is to increase the tele-density. But in the 
absence of conclusive research, we prefer to observe caution.”

In view of the Minister’s elaborate information I wanted to know what the 
minister is going to do to create awareness amongst the people and whether he 
was willing to come down to Goa to explain his side to the people.

And here is what he said: “As recently as October last year, I was in Goa. Goa 
is a peculiar state where there is a lot of resistance from local bodies. In 
fact, the question pertains to towers not being allowed and being given NoCs by 
panchayats in Goa. I have 17 cases of BSNL alone in different parts of Goa 
where local bodies have opposed this. I think the issue is that there is a 
public perception problem with regard to radiation. I would like to make it 
clear to the entire House and to the country that setting standards for 
radiation limits from towers and enforcing that is only the domain of DoT and 
the TERM Cell. There is no reason for state governments or municipalities or 
panchayats to take this into their own hands. In terms of radiation we are 
following the best practices around the world. We have the best capacity to 
enforce that. Where we would like the state governments, the municipalities and 
the panchayats to get involved is, perhaps, when they look at the structural 
safety of the buildings or when they look at setback areas. So, to spread 
awareness we, in DoT, are calling a meeting some time soon, where we will have 
the state governments represented, to try and give them some uniformity in 
terms of guidelines.”

Responding to Dr Chandan Mitra, a senior journalist and MP’s claim that in the 
state of Jharkhand hundreds and thousands of crows have fallen from these 
towers and died, Mr Deora told the House, “I can say that, as of now, 
internationally also there is no conclusive research to suggest that any 
species is being harmed by this. But all that we can do is, we can adhere to 
the best of standards. We have even moved away for ICNIRP, which is the global 
norm, to a more stringent standard. But we are monitoring this very closely.

“I can say that personally I am very passionate about this because I come from 
Mumbai. In Mumbai also there is a public opinion like it is there in Goa about 
the ill-effects of mobile towers on humans, on other species. We are monitoring 
this very closely and as and when there is any research that moves towards some 
kind of conclusion we will adopt that and move to those standards.” (The writer 
is a Rajya Sabha MP)

-- 
Saligao-Net is at http://groups.google.com/group/saligao-net 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe email [email protected]

Reply via email to