RE: [SA-list] New check position

[Dirk Bulinckx]

Title: Message

Not sure to understand what you mean with it.  Can you explain it a bit more?

 

dirk.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Rosiak, John
Sent: Thu Mar 27 8:45 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SA-list] New check position

Thanks, Dirk,

 

You may also want to  consider a positioning "flag" of sorts to be able to set up a new dependency check, e.g.  level set the dependencies in the tree... 1,2,3,4,5,6, etc. and then update other checks to position them appropriately.  It may be more helpful then just drag and drop.

 

Just a thought !

 

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Dirk Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] New check position

Just add it at the end of the group and drap & drop all others to it, that way they will depend on it and automaticly they will be seen "under" it too.

Only problem is that you will have to drap & drop them one-by-one and yes in the next version (4.1 or 4.2) it will be possible to drap & drop multiple items.

 

dirk.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Rosiak, John
Sent: Thu Mar 27 8:08 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [SA-list] New check position

Dirk and all,

Is there a way to insert a new check in the first position of an existing group, without establishing a new group and then mass-copying the dependents ???

For example.....  A number of network switch pings that now depend on a master switch.  If the master switch isn't up, don't bother with the rest of the sub checks.

Or, is this the good part of the next upgrade ???

Continue the excellent work, Dirk !

John      
The McGraw-Hill Companies
LAN & Specialty Servers
609.426.5842