Or, what about a
similar case to have a check performed ONLY if the dependor was in
maintenance.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg A Weigold
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 12:46
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Depends
on
But if B already
has a dependency on something else....
:-)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE:
Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or
other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government
initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
"Dirk
Bulinckx" <dirk
@woodstone.nu>
Sent by:
salive-owner
10/14/2004
13:25
Please respond to
salive |
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Depends
on |
if b
depends on a, and a is in maintenance, and b will not be seen as down but as
unavailable, that's already like that in the current product....
Dirk.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg A Weigold
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 7:19
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Depends
on
Well, if Server A was in
maintenance, and Server B depended on it for access to something (like FTP
services), instead of reporting a down indicating Server B was down, you might
report UNAVAILABLE due to Server A (FTP Service) not functioning... or
some odd thing like that...
I guess that reporting
something in MAINT instead of DOWN might make a big difference in reporting
statistics....
Greg
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This
is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete
without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in delivery. NOTE:
Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC to any order or
other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement or government
initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
"Dirk
Bulinckx" <dirk
@woodstone.nu>
Sent by:
salive-owner
10/14/2004
13:00
Please respond to
salive |
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: [SA-list]
Depends on |
What would be the use of
that?
Dirk.
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
gene Martinez
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004
6:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
[SA-list] Depends on
Has anyone thought or wanted/needed a check to
depend on something being in
the maintenance mode? I know you have have the
check depend on up or down,
but I was thinking you might want to have a check
that depends on something
being in maintenance? Any
thoughts?
Regards,
Gene
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.eclipse.net/~njkat
-------------------------
[This
E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To unsubscribe from a list,
send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of
the message:
unsubscribe
SAlive
-------------------------
[This
E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
To unsubscribe from a list,
send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of
the message:
unsubscribe
SAlive
