That wasn't development, that was just writing it in a mail :-)
Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael D. Shook Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] features for the far future ? Sweet! Now that's fast development!!! Michael D. Shook Technical Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 863 668 4477 (work) 863 860 4070 (cell) 863 665 1261 (fax) www.saddlecrk.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 8:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] features for the far future ? I uses the hostname/prettyname and remark. Only show the found entries can't be done. Being case (in)sensitive is something we could add as option (in v5). Also it only does a FIND, not a FIND NEXT...also something for the future (I suppose). Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael D. Shook Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] features for the far future ? WHAT!?!?!?!!? A feature I missed? Well, I'll be D$&*#d. Could you make that non-case sensitive? Is it only the host or pretty name? Could it be setup to force the GUI to only display checks containing the search string? THANKS!!!!!!! Michael D. Shook Technical Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 863 668 4477 (work) 863 860 4070 (cell) 863 665 1261 (fax) www.saddlecrk.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] features for the far future ? 1) if within the mail you have the name/prettyname, then you can FIND the entry with the find option too. Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael D. Shook Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] features for the far future ? 1) Actually, I already have HTML features implemented for this from a lookup POV, I was hoping for something in the GUI to make updates and changes easier. What happened was we got an alert sent out to the wrong team, but then I spent quite a few minutes trying to find the offending check entry so I could fix it. 2) Sounds like you understand what is needed on this one. Check C would be dependant on Check A AND Check B being UP. Michael D. Shook Technical Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 863 668 4477 (work) 863 860 4070 (cell) 863 665 1261 (fax) www.saddlecrk.com -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 7:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SA-list] features for the far future ? 1) From a configuration point this looks difficult....what I do see as a possibility is to have within the HTML output something for this. We could add an <sa... Parameter that gives the number of cycles that an entry is within the current status, with the possibility to sort by that parameter too, that way you could get the "new"-downs before the "old"-downs, what do you think? 2) Something that we're looking at (no not for v5.0 :-)) is depending on a group. This comes close to what you need I think. From what I understand the entries can be only be checked if NIC_1 OR(AND) NIC_2 are OK, correct? Dirk. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael D. Shook Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SA-list] features for the far future ? I just ran across a couple of situations that didn't quite fit the current SA. 1) Would it be possible for the GUI to offer a new color choice or icon or something for those checks that are newly changed in status? Like if it's gone from UP to DOWN or Down to unavailable? Maybe have a 3 or 5 cycle limit before it just displays the status as it does now? With a great wad of similar checks it's kind of hard to find the server that just went UP. 2) We now have all of our servers using teamed NICs for network redundancy. Each NIC is patched to a different switch. This means that I really need the server check dependant on TWO other checks. Is this functionality possible for the future? Thanks!!!!!!! Michael D. Shook Technical Analyst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 863 668 4477 (work) 863 860 4070 (cell) 863 665 1261 (fax) www.saddlecrk.com ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive ------------------------- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] With the following in the body of the message: unsubscribe SAlive
