>From what I'm picking up off the list, psexec sounds very similar to the
hacking tool "netcat". Instantiating a remote command prompt on an NT/2000
system, that is basically accessible to anyone who knows it's there, should
give everyone the willies. It takes about 10 seconds to fire off an LSASS
injector to dump the SAM into a txt which you can then password crack
offline, at your leisure! Be very scared!

Ideally, the client/server setup would be more secure in that the
listener/agent would only accept connections from the appropriate server (as
Dirk mentioned, specified IP, username, password, etc). Nothing is 100% safe
but this is a hell of a lot safer. IMHO.

Alistair Francis
Systems Administrator
Comm Express Services SA (PTY) LTD
TEL:    +27 (0)11 475-5567
FAX:   +27 (0)11 475-6238
CELL: +27 (0)84 607-7325

The information contained in this electronic mail message is confidential to
the Matragon group of companies and may enjoy legal privilege. The contents
are intended solely for the addressee and access thereto by anyone else is
unauthorised. Should you not be the intended recipient, kindly delete the
message and inform us. Any disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please also note that any action taken, or omitted to
be taken in reliance on the information contained herein is done at your own
risk.



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: 24 November 2004 09:10
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Remote command as alert


The way psexec (probably) works isn't therefore something great.
>From my understanding:
        it copies it self (or part) to the remote system
        install it as a service
        starts the service
        service executes the "commandline"
        service stops
        service removes itself
        service file is deleted

For this to work you need not only admin access to the remote system but you
also need netbios access to the remote system.

With an agent approche all would be done via ONE port (TCP probably) and as
such will not require the use of Netbios.


Dirk.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 1:59 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Remote command as alert

Wouldn't necessarily require an agent.

See http://sysinternals.com for their psexec utility.

All you need is admin rights on the remote box.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Alistair Francis
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 03:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SA-list] Remote command as alert
>
>
> Yup, it would be useful, even though it requires an agent on
> the target
> machine. The only problem I can see is security. It would need to be
> seriously tight, possibly some sort of encrypted key between
> server and
> agent. If it was as simple as telneting to a certain port on
> the target mac
> and issuing commands... (shudder!) imagine what a IT savvy disgruntled
> employee could do! Are you thinking of a restricted command
> set or something
> along the lines of a remote command prompt type thing?
>
> Alistair Francis
> Systems Administrator
> Comm Express Services SA (PTY) LTD
> TEL:    +27 (0)11 475-5567
> FAX:   +27 (0)11 475-6238
> CELL: +27 (0)84 607-7325
>
> The information contained in this electronic mail message is
> confidential to
> the Matragon group of companies and may enjoy legal
> privilege. The contents
> are intended solely for the addressee and access thereto by
> anyone else is
> unauthorised. Should you not be the intended recipient,
> kindly delete the
> message and inform us. Any disclosure, copying or
> distribution is prohibited
> and may be unlawful. Please also note that any action taken,
> or omitted to
> be taken in reliance on the information contained herein is
> done at your own
> risk.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
> Sent: 23 November 2004 13:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SA-list] Remote command as alert
>
>
> Is the possibility to execute a command on a remote system
> (currently only
> possible on the system running SA), something that would be
> of any help
> knowing that for that you would have to have a "remotecommand" service
> installed on the system(s) that need to execute those commands.
>
> Dirk.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------
>
> [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
>
> To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> With the following in the body of the message:
>    unsubscribe SAlive
>







-------------------------

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive






-------------------------

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive




-------------------------

[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

To unsubscribe from a list, send a mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With the following in the body of the message:
   unsubscribe SAlive

Reply via email to