John,

 

I encountered a similar issue with a Jrun service over a year ago, and I now monitor that process using ‘perfmon>process>privatebytes’ which allows me to get within 10 MB of the memory usage that is shown being used by the task in task manager.  I now specify that when my margin [100 mb.] is exceeded, I restart the task through SA automatically. I also have it notify me when it happens. I haven’t had a complaint since.

 

Give it a shot!

 

John
[609.426.5842]


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harrington, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 10:00 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Process Monitoring Question

 

Well, you get instances when you choose the counters and there’s no counter for memory usage under processes, and no instances listed under process in the memory list…  So I may be out of luck…

 

John H.

AT&T

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Process Monitoring Question

 

And in the instances list?

 

Dirk.

 

 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harrington, John
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:32 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Process Monitoring Question

Hmmm, I thought about that, but the only counters under Process are:

 

% Priveleged Time

% Processor Time

% User Time

Creating Process ID

Elapsed Time

Handle Count

IO Process

IO Data Bytes/sec

IO Data Operations/sec

IO Other Bytes/sec

IO Other Operations/sec

IO Read Bytes/sec

IO Read Operations/sec

IO Write Bytes/sec

IO Write Operations/sec

Page Faults/sec

Page File Bytes

Page File Bytes Peak

Pool Nonpaged Bytes

Pool Paged Bytes

Priority Base

Private Bytes

Thread Count

Virtual Bytes

Virtual Bytes Peak

Working Set, and

Working Sete Peak

 

Really nothing concerning memory usage per se.  If anyone knows of a way even to approximate how much memory a certain process is using, I’d appreciate hearing your thoughts.

 

 


The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient, and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please be aware that any dissemination or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Thank you,
The McGraw-Hill Companies

Reply via email to