Thank you to everyone for your excellent
information.....I've made the registry change as suggested by Dirk and my cycle
time is down to 16 minutes.
Chris Mang>>
ITG Operations Security Administrator
ITG Operations Security Administrator
JDA Software Group, Inc.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 3:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SA-list] One monitoring server or more?
I can comment on your final question. It's very easy to combine multiple outputs onto a single page, if you use some INCLUDE statements in an SHTML or similar page. I do this to combine loads of generated pages into a few "master" pages, which gives great flexibility (especially when you format them all with CSS).
Cheers,
Ian
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854
| "Chris S. Mang"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/07/2005 22:52
|
|
Hello,
Currently, we monitor almost 900 items across a number of servers around the world, utilizing one instance of Servers Alive 4.1. It currently takes about 18 minutes to run through all those checks. I would like to reduce that response time by 50%.
Does anyone run multiple Servers Alive instances (on different servers) to improve performance?
What are some of the plusses and minuses to running multiple SA servers versus a single SA server (other than cost of additional licensing for multiple servers)?
How difficult is it to combine the web page output from multiple SA servers?
Thanks for any information you provide!
Chris Mang>>
JDA
Software Group, Inc.
