Were you have now "is < than" , "is > than", " is =
to","is <> from" there you would like "is contained in" and "is not
contained in"?
Dirk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [SA-list] feature request...
For the error level
checks can I get a "is contained in [x,z,y]" and "is not contained in [a,d,e]".
I use the filecheck and I'd like to have a down when the result is either 1 or
3. I know some of the other error level checks use multiple errors, so I think
it would need to be more complicated than a simple "or" like you did for the
SNMP checks.
Thanks to the
"horde"!!!
Michael D. Shook
Technical Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
863 668 4477 (work)
863 860 4070 (cell)
863 665 1261 (fax)
www.saddlecrk.com
Technical Analyst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
863 668 4477 (work)
863 860 4070 (cell)
863 665 1261 (fax)
www.saddlecrk.com
--------------------------------------
The information contained in this
message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient or agent of the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the
message is strictly prohibited.
