|
Can you connect to the remote registry? (via
regedit)
Dirk. From: Barron,Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:20 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] What can masquerade as a name resolution problem? SA is normally run as a
service, so I don’t see how I can do this….? However, I’ve tried the
same checks running SA as a application, and with the same result.
I apologize if I am
misunderstanding your question. Joe From: Dirk
Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you doing this as
the same user that is running SA? Dirk. From:
Barron,Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If I do that, I get a
list of shares for that server. It does not show the admin shares,
however. (And I suppose it shouldn’t.) From: Dirk
Bulinckx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What happens if from
the system running SA (and as the user running SA) you take an OS prompt and do
a NET VIEW
\\<server> (<server> is one
were you get the 53 error). Dirk. From:
Barron,Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] My ServersAlive install was inactive
for quite a long time. (Couple of months.. Long story as to
why.) Yesterday I fired it back up,
installed the new API based eventlog check, and away I
went… The majority of my tasks have been
created once, then replicated. For the majority of hosts I’m
checking, all tasks are working well. For two or three hosts, my perfmon
and NTProcess checks fail with: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:29:39 PM
XXXXXXXLS1 LMPC Support PC CPU Usage Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:29:47 PM
XXXXXXXLS1 Perfmon (Processor,% Processor Time,0) gave errorThe network path was
not found. ( 53) Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:29:56 PM
XXXXXXXLS1 LMPC Support PC CPU Usage Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:30:02 PM
XXXXXXXLS1 Perfmon (Processor,% Processor Time,0) gave errorThe network path was
not found. Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:49:09 PM
XXXXXXXLS1 LMPC Support PC EPO Agent Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:49:15 PM
ERR process check: ERR: 53 Wednesday, March 01, 2006 1:49:15 PM
NT Process check of UpdaterUI on SEUSCITYLS1 failed While the specifics vary from server
to server and check to check (of course) this is the output of every perfmon or
NT Process check on the three affected servers. Now, you might think this is
obviously a name resolution problem. It’s not. (Well, at least not
obviously so.) Please see the following supporting
details: n
Even the problem servers are
responding properly to n
Other servers are responding
properly to the same checks that are failing on the problem servers. When
I say “same”, I mean replicated directly from the same source check as those
that are currently failing. n
While I theoretically own these
machines, the nature of their use is such that it would not be impossible for a
well meaning local person to make changes on that end. However, I wouldn’t
even know what to look at, given that most checks work on the problem
machines. I have checked the archive,
apologies if I’m missed a similar problem. Joe
*********************************************************************** The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected] To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected] |
