So starting with OS-ERR would make it clear I suppose?
Dirk Bulinckx. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 8:35 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] in regards to my last Yes I know but there are so many different OS messages that if I could just distinguish between OS messages and actual check result generically that would be much more efficient. Also I cannot create an alert where extra info should not contain a or b or c. Therefore I must put in the ones where I would want the alert and since the countfiles could any integer (realistically in my situation 5 or 10) I would have a hug number of duplicate alerts for each integer. Jason Passow Mississippi Welders Supply [EMAIL PROTECTED] ph: (507) 494-5178 fax: (507) 454-8104 "If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at all." Dirk Bulinckx wrote: > In both cases a down seems normal. > Within the alert message, if you use the %e parameter you can see the > reason of the down, and that will (in most cases) tell you exactly why > you get the down. > > > Dirk Bulinckx. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 8:20 PM > To: Servers Alive Discussion List > Subject: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] in regards to my last > > Nope. I was just wondering if somehow it could be done. it seems to > me that the check result and an error form the OS should be > distinguishable somehow. If I come up with anything I will certainly pass it along. > > Jason Passow > Mississippi Welders Supply > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ph: (507) 494-5178 > fax: (507) 454-8104 > > "If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything > at all." > > > > Dirk Bulinckx wrote: > >> Currently not. >> Can you propose something how you would see this? >> >> >> Dirk Bulinckx. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jason Passow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 8:05 PM >> To: Servers Alive Discussion List >> Subject: [SA-list] in regards to my last >> >> Is there way Salive can distinguish between actual check failures and >> errors returned by the OS? I know that I can use the %e parameter to >> alert with certain conditions. However I have the particular alert >> in question to alert every 5 down cycles. In this event it was a problem >> with the check itself not with the actual condition. There are so many >> values to account for that I was wondering if there is any way >> programatically to determined the difference? then I could have >> separate alerts for when the condition of the check is (or is not) >> met and one for if the check fails for another reason. >> >> >> > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to > [email protected] To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as > subject to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected] To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
