That upload was done....build 2005 or more recent has the feature (http://beta.woodstone.nu)
Dirk Bulinckx. -----Original Message----- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 4:27 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] YAFR (yet another feature request) In the next beta upload (http://beta.woodstone.nu) there will be a registry setting for the hostid. OR the hostId will be the one of the copied entry OR it will be empty when doing a copy. Dirk Bulinckx. -----Original Message----- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 5:26 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] YAFR (yet another feature request) My issue started with a total disregard for the host id's in general, compounded by frequent check duplication. (for instance, I have 8 servers for Citrix. I created the checks for the first then duplicated for the other 7.) The trick, I have learned, is that when you duplicate a check, (with CTRL-D for instance,) the HostID of the original check is maintained on the "Copy of" window instead of being blanked out or set to a new unique value. If you change the settings but don't clear the HostID, it will save as a duplicated HostID of the original. Then, when you have interchange data and RRD graphs that are strictly tied to the HostID then the last occurance of a duplicated HostID will overwrite the data being saved for each of the prior occurances. If you delete the HostID value, it will be set to a unique ID upon saving and the issue goes away. So, Dirk, to extend my original feature request... Can I get a bugfix on the side? Can the HostID be cleared when we duplicate a check? -Rob > I use Host IDs to do just that - id a host. Each host gets a unique > ID and all checks for that host use the same ID. This becomes very > useful when using the interchange file to generate reports. I guess > you could have SA check to make sure each first level check has a > unique host ID but I'm not sure it's needed. > > Each check also has a unique ID that is determined by SA. > > -Kevin > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Dirk, >> >> I have had a hard time resolving duplicated host-id's in the past. >> >> Is there an option that I can enable or can you add an option in the >> setup window to enable or disable a verification upon saving of the >> checks to ensure (or allow) duplicated host id's? >> >> Is there a reason to allow dupplication of host id's? I did not ever >> care about them until I started graphing the checks! >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> Rob Petty >> >> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to >> [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like >> out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to >> the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a >> message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. >> > > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to > [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office > messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to > the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this > will get you removed from the list. > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.
