RE: [SA-list] AV Check

Tue, 22 Aug 2006 05:58:28 -0700

This would mean that this list would have for each AV that we 'support', the signature version and the release date of it.
And that the AV check would query that list to see how old his/her version is, right?
 

Dirk Bulinckx.

 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:46 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] AV Check

Well, with such a list the  you could tell folks just how out of date their version of AV is, as Ian would like.
 
I'd have to agree, as having a version that is 1 or days out of date isn't really something I want to woken up at 3am over.
 
So, this way you can give the users some parameters (How old, x number of version old, etc...)
 
You could even use this to send a non-down email that a new version became available 5 minutes ago, without incurring a DOWN penalty that might be set if the version is 5 days old.
 
Michael D. Shook
Technical Analyst
Saddle Creek Corporation
Michael.Shook@saddlecrk.com
863 668 4477 (work)
863 860 4070 (cell)
863 665 1261 (fax)
www.saddlecrk.com
 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 8:31 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] AV Check

Can you elaborate?
What would be the purpose of such a list?
 

Dirk Bulinckx.

 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:11 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] AV Check

I'm gonna go WAY out on a limb here....
 
But if Woodstone (or another party) were to keep a publicly available cache file of all the versions and the dates they first appeared, then the check could reference that list instead of just grabbing the most recent version number from the manufacturer.
 
Perhaps with a few mirror sites around the globe...
 
I wouldn't mind hosting such a list on the Users Group site.
 
Michael D. Shook
Technical Analyst
Saddle Creek Corporation
Michael.Shook@saddlecrk.com
863 668 4477 (work)
863 860 4070 (cell)
863 665 1261 (fax)
www.saddlecrk.com
 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:31 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] AV Check

Not all the AV products have "numbers" as version, so that wouldn't realy work out well...
 

Dirk Bulinckx.

 

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:21 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: [SA-list] AV Check


A suggestion for an enhancement to the AV check (which is working very well).

I wonder if it would be possible to measure not whether the local version equals the remote version, but the difference between them. In other words, if the local version was 543 and the remote version was 544, the result would be -1. The benefit of this is that you could choose to ignore (or treat differently) a machine that is only just out of date, but take more seriously a machine that was several versions out of date.

Just a thought.

Ian
_________________________________
Ian K Gray
OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.

--------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the message is strictly prohibited.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.



To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.

--------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of the message is strictly prohibited.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.



To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list.

Reply via email to