There is no jdbc add-on available at this point.   No one has ever requested 
such a thing.

I think the concern is not the exposure in the file or the interface as those 
both should be protected using NTFS permissions, and locked down servers.   I 
think the concern is that the password is transmitted plain text (as far as I 
know).  However I think that if someone is sniffing your internal LAN them 
getting a database password is the least of your concerns.  
Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104

"If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at all."


Michael Shook wrote: SQL Server 2005 Where are you worried about exposure? Yes, 
there is some risk of a person standing at the Servers Alive server opening the 
files and getting the password. 
 
We answered this question 2 ways: 
 
One, the Servers Alive server itself is no more or less secure than the 
Database Server (physically as well as electronically). 
Two, we created a read only SQL user just for data lookup. 
 
Since we have to use ODBC in the normal course of business, we felt that these 
2 points brought the security up to our comfort level. A hacker might possibly 
be able to get a copy of our data, but he wouldn't be able to modify it. The 
data we keep is of low enough value to the outside world that this solution is 
deemed acceptable. 
 
On a side note, we have started to look into JDBC connections. Does anyone have 
any input on those? Are they any more secure? Is there a JDBC lookup COM Addon 
available? 
 

Michael D. Shook
Systems Analyst - Data Integration
Saddle Creek Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
863 668 4477 (work)
863 665 1261 (fax)
www.saddlecrk.com (http://www.saddlecrk.com/)  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])] On Behalf Of Ferrell, Jim
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:41 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] SQL Server 2005


On a side note, we abandoned using ODBC checks against databases because it 
exposes user ID and password. 
 


Jim Ferrell 
EDS - Allison Transmission 
4700 W 10th St 
Mail Code 462-470-H04 
Indianapolis, IN 4622 
phone: 317-242-0034 (8-252) 
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
cell: 317-716-4541 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])] On Behalf Of Jason Passow
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:30 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SA-list] SQL Server 2005

Yes it is.  You can run any SQL query against the server and receive a response 
using the ODBC check.

Jason Passow
Mississippi Welders Supply
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph: (507) 494-5178
fax: (507) 454-8104

"If you do everything right, nobody will realize you've done anything at all."
      


Krüger Philipp wrote: 

Hello List, 

do you know wether it is possible to check a database of a MS SQL Server 2005 
with Server Alives 6 ??? 

I tried but got errors. 



Thanks in advance, 

Philipp 

_______________________________________
                               Philipp Krüger
                 System- / Netzwerkadministrator
 
         German Heart Institute Berlin Services GmbH
                -am Deutschen Herzzentrum Berlin
 
                 Phone  0049 / 30 4593 1488
                 Fax       0049 / 30 4593 3051
                 Mail     [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
                 PGP      0xab12c457
_______________________________________ 





To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. 

--------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the use of the 
addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or agent 
of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, 
distribution, or copying of the message is strictly prohibited.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message. Doing this will get you removed from the list. 

Reply via email to