I've been using Mercury for years(maybe even longer than SA) and
communication about the development process has never been great.  The new
community site and developer blog has been a great step forward...

http://community.pmail.com/blogs/mercury32/default.aspx

-Kevin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:30 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] OT mailserver

HE's getting near a new release (4.51) but didn't find a list that shows
what was done n the build .. 


Dirk Bulinckx. 
-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kevin Stone
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 1:56 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] OT mailserver

Yes, it does not run natively as a service.  It is on the developers list
but progress isn't exactly swift with Mercury.

-Kevin 

-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dirk Bulinckx
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 6:10 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] OT mailserver

It seems to be a good choice except for the service part....
I uses SRVANY (or something like INVOKER) to run as service.... 


Dirk Bulinckx. 
-----Original Message-----
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Bell, Robert
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:36 PM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] OT mailserver

Although it's been a while since I last used it, I quite liked David Harris'
Mercury.

http://www.pmail.com/overviews/ovw_mercwin.htm



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Servers Alive Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:11 PM
> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
> Subject: [SA-list] OT mailserver
> 
> 
> At Woodstone we are internaly running 3 mailservers (SMTP).
> 
> One is used as backup MX record for our domains on the internet (with 
> their own SMTP servers on the internet), and a 2nd mailserver that is 
> simply used for outgoing mail (users
> mail) and a 3rd mailserver for outgoing mail from the listserver.
> 
> That 3rd server is running the MS SMTP service (that is default with 
> Windows 2000).  We're having a lot of issues with it were it seems OR 
> not to be able to do the DNS lookup correctly OR not able to connect 
> to the remote server Or giving relay errors that are not correct.
> When doing the same MX lookup via an NSLOOKUP on that system it works 
> fine, when doing a TELNET <host> 25 from that system it works fine 
> too, so it's realy a problem with the MS SMTP service as such. So we 
> would like to replace this MS SMTP service by something else that 
> works fine.
> 
> What are we exactly looking for?
>       * SMTP server that can run as service on Win2000
>       * It should provide an "interface" that shows the activity of the 
> server
>       * it should provide a simple "interface" to do the configuration (if

> there is any to do)
>       * it should be able to send directly (doing MX lookup and send it
via 
> the found server) and also via a SMART HOST.
>       * it should work :-)
>       * it should be able to work without any mailbox (we're not having 
> mailboxes on our internal smtp servers)
>       * ideal it should be able to have several receiver and sender
threads 
> (ideal even possible to configure the number)
>       * good pricing :-)
>       
> I could use the same type as we have on the 1st or 2nd SMTP server, 
> but prefer not to do, so currently we have an "old"
> WinRoute mailserver and an ArgoSoft mailserver running.
> 
> 
> 
> All suggestions are welcome.....
> 
> 
> Dirk Bulinckx.
> 
> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to 
> [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office 
> messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to 
> the individual members of the list that send a message.  Doing this 
> will get you removed from the list.
> 
> 

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
[email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office
messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the
individual members of the list that send a message.  Doing this will get you
removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
[email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office
messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the
individual members of the list that send a message.  Doing this will get you
removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
[email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office
messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the
individual members of the list that send a message.  Doing this will get you
removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to
[email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office
messages), then make sure that they are not send to the list nor to the
individual members of the list that send a message.  Doing this will get you
removed from the list.

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.

Reply via email to