When I run SAlive 6 on Windows XP as a standalone application, checking the 
same Windows 2003 Server (Web edition), the result is inconclusive. I gave 
it 600 seconds, and it timed out. During the check, both processors were 
pegged at 100% (half to serversalive, half to the comaw~1.exe application) 
and I could see a trickle of constant network activity.

On Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:45 AM, Dirk Bulinckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

> Does it do the same with the support v6 of Servers Alive?
>
> Dirk Bulinckx.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf 
> Of
> Richard Sleegers
> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 5:31 PM
> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [SA-list] Eventlog COM check error
>
> As I said, Windows 2000 Server SP4 checking event log on remote Windows 
> 2003
> Server, so SA is on the W2K system as a service.
>
> On Tuesday, November 06, 2007 11:25 AM, Dirk Bulinckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> What OS is SA running on, and what OS is on the remote system?
>>
>> Dirk Bulinckx.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
>> Behalf
>> Of
>> Richard Sleegers
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 4:56 PM
>> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: [SA-list] Eventlog COM check error
>>
>> Yes, this is repeatable.
>> My other event log checks are local, I'm trying to expand to remote event
>> log checks. I can successfully share a drive from the remote machine to 
>> my
>> trusted IP so the file sharing ports appear to be working fine (which is
>> what remote event viewer uses, I assume). I tried a second remote machine
>> with the same results (same O/S combination). After about 310000 ms it
>> fails
>> with "Object variable or With block variable not set" - I gave it 600
>> seconds to see if it was just taking a long time, otherwise it was timing
>> out.
>>
>> On Tuesday, November 06, 2007 1:35 AM, Dirk Bulinckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> does it do this all the time with this entry?
>>> do you have other checks defined for remote event log checks?
>>>
>>> Dirk Bulinckx.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf
>>> Of
>>> Richard Sleegers
>>> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 11:30 PM
>>> To: Servers Alive Discussion List
>>> Subject: [SA-list] Eventlog COM check error
>>>
>>> ERR: COM Check problem (W00000012,122, 350):Object variable or With 
>>> block
>>> variable not set
>>>
>>> I have checked this thread:
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg10077.html but could
>>> not
>>> see any resolutions there. My specs:
>>>
>>> Servers Alive 5.1.1967 running as service, no terminal services.
>>> Windows 2000 Server SP4 checking event log on remote Windows 2003 Server
>>> Web
>>> Edition
>>>
>>> External COM's Eventlog Check setup (version 2.0 build 59):
>>> Give down when 'at least one' ...
>>> Hostname: [remote server's IP address]
>>> Logfile: System
>>> Source: EventLog
>>> Category:
>>> Event ID: 6008
>>> User:
>>> Use Authentication: checked, and username has server\username and
>>> password
>>> fields
>>> Type: Error is checked
>>> Return: All matching entries
>>>
>>> Eventlog COM checks on the local network work fine. I have opened all
>>> ports
>>> 137-139 TCP/UDP for access by the SAlive server
>>> If I put an incorrect username or password, the error changes to:
>>> External COM check (W00000012,122):ERR: Unable to connect to host.( 7)
>>> so I believe the connection information is correct - I can even see
>>> increased network activity on the remote server.
>>>
>>> Any other ideas?
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> Richard
>>>

To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE as subject to [email protected]
If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), then make sure 
that they are not send to the list nor to the individual members of the list 
that send a message.  Doing this will get you removed from the list.

Reply via email to