I said "extra logging within debugview", so not within the normal SA logfile...just visible via debugview
dirk. On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:31:10 +0200, Lau Daniels wrote: > Dirk, > Installed the new beta v7.0.2565 > > Tried logging with minimum, medium, maximum but nothing there... > Only; > donderdag 25 april 2013 15:14:45 SNMPGet (3) 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.8 > on 192.10.10.50 > donderdag 25 april 2013 15:14:45 SNMP took 3 ms(386) > donderdag 25 april 2013 15:14:45 Status changed to DOWN due to INVERT > option > > no extra logging. > > Lau > > -----Original Message----- > From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx > Sent: woensdag 24 april 2013 20:01 > To: Servers Alive Discussion List > Subject: RE: [SA-list] snmp bandwith monitoring > > There is a new version on http://beta.woodstone.nu were you will get > extra logging within debugview. > > Logging will look like: > [8048] Formula : (sa_currentresult - sa_previousresult) < 20000000 > [8048] sa_currentresult : 811496258 [8048] sa_previousresult : > 811484686 [8048] sa_currenttimeinms : 59146491 [8048] > sa_previoustimeinms : 59145083 [8048] Formula result : TRUE > > > Dirk Bulinckx > Servers Alive - http://www.woodstone.nu > StellarDNS (DNS Hosting) - http://www.stellardns.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of dirk > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:01 PM > To: Servers Alive Discussion List > Subject: RE: [SA-list] snmp bandwith monitoring > > The result of the formula is a TRUE/FALSE as we evaluate the > expression (within an "external" part of SA). > > > > dirk. > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:30:43 +0200, Lau Daniels wrote: >> Dirk, >> >> Thanks, appreciate it. >> >> We had a slow build up of DDos requests over one of our internet >> lines. We didn't monitor the usage of the internet lines, just >> trying >> to implement it now in SA so we can be warned if a line is going to >> be >> flooded. >> >> I think it would be a great feature if it's possible to store it >> also >> in RRD, so you could watch the trend of bandwidth over time in RRD. >> Maybe an "SA buildin check" on SNMP that checks a OID twice in a row >> and gives the result back? >> >> Lau >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of dirk >> Sent: woensdag 24 april 2013 14:46 >> To: Servers Alive Discussion List >> Subject: RE: [SA-list] snmp bandwith monitoring >> >> Only the current result is stored in the RRD db. >> I'll see if I can add some logging so the result of the formula is >> also logged (not in RRD sorry) so you can see what it gives and why >> you get the "wrong" result. >> >> >> dirk >> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:15:52 +0200, Lau Daniels wrote: >>> Dirk, >>> >>> I was sure i missed it somewhere ;-) >>> >>> But anyway, did some testing and I >>> donÃÆÃâÃââÃÆââââ¬à ¡ÃâìÃÆâââ∠>>> ¾Ãâât get it to work. >>> >>> I get snmp data back from the firewall with SNMP check oid - >>> 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.8 = Total Downloaded in Bytes >>> >>> I made it really simple, just a formula (sa_currentresult - >>> sa_previousresult) < 20000000 is false >>> >>> I gives me as sa_previousresult: 937675260 and sa_currentresult: >>> 944442813 should result in 6767553 >>> The response of SA is: 944442813 should be: (sa_currentresult - >>> sa_previousresult) < 20000000 >>> >>> Even if I enter 200 it still gives "down". Missing something again? >>> >>> And also another question: >>> Is there a way to store the result of the formula in the RDD >>> database >>> or only the sa_currentresult? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Lau >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of dirk >>> Sent: dinsdag 23 april 2013 9:16 >>> To: Servers Alive Discussion List >>> Subject: Re: [SA-list] snmp bandwith monitoring >>> >>> You can use a formula for this. >>> >>> For example: >>> >>> (sa_currentresult - sa_previousresult) / (sa_currenttimeinms - >>> sa_previoustimeinms) <5 >>> >>> Would give an alert if the currentresult - previous result devided >>> by >>> the (current time in ms -previous time in ms) would be smaller then >>> 5 >>> >>> >>> In the doc under the part of the SNMP CHECK TAB there is this >>> example >>> too >>> >>> Hope this helps >>> >>> >>> >>> dirk >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:15:38 +0200, Lau Daniels wrote: >>>> Hi Dirk, >>>> >>>> Just finished searching for a decent document about bandwidth >>>> monitoring using Serversalive. Nothing >>>> foundÃÆÃâÃââÃÆâââ∠>>>> ¡ÃâìÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâæ.. >>>> >>>> I know I can do a snmp query for ifInOctets for interface 8 with >>>> 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.10.8. >>>> This gives me the The total number of octets received on the >>>> interface. >>>> >>>> Nice to know but I want the difference between two poll cycles. >>>> Average_Input=Total_Input (in BITS)/ Time (in SEC) >>>> >>>> Dirk, is this possible with Serversalive? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Lau >>>> >>>> ------------------------- >>>> >>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are >>>> confidentialÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâ >>>> andÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâ intended >>>> solely for the use of the >>>> individual or entity to whom theyÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâ >>>> are >>>> addressed.ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâ If >>>> you have received this email in error please >>>> notifyÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâ the >>>> sender. >>>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of >>>> the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. >>>> >>>> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept >>>> by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses but we cannot >>>> accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use >>>> of >>>> this email and/or attachment(s). >>>> >>>> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject >>>> line >>>> to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like >>>> out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to >>>> the >>>> list nor to individual members. >>>> Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line >>> to >>> [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like >>> out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to >>> the >>> list nor to individual members. >>> Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. >>> >>> >>> >>> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line >>> to >>> [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like >>> out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to >>> the >>> list nor to individual members. >>> Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. >> >> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line >> to >> [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like >> out-of-the-office >> messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to >> individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically >> removed from the list. >> >> >> ************************************************** >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they >> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please >> notify >> the sender. >> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of >> the >> author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. >> >> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept >> by >> MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses but we cannot >> accept >> responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this >> email and/or attachment(s). >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line >> to >> [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like >> out-of-the-office >> messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to >> individual members. >> Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. > > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to > [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like > out-of-the-office > messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to > individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically > removed from the list. > > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to > [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like > out-of-the-office > messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to > individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically > removed from the list. > > > > To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to > [email protected] > If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make > sure that they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. > Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list. -- Dirk Bulinckx Servers Alive - http://www.woodstone.nu DNS Hosting on StellarDNS - http://www.stellardns.com To unsubscribe send a message with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line to [email protected] If you use auto-responders (like out-of-the-office messages), make sure that they are not sent to the list nor to individual members. Doing so will cause you to be automatically removed from the list.
