On Dec 9, 2004, at 11:13 pm, Simon Cooke wrote:
Sector addresses which do not directly correspond to their real location on
disk - eg. on track 4 you'd have a sector which had a sector ID of 10, and a
track id of 255.
(This happens in the Parallax copy protection).
ooh, sneaky!
Any truly generic archive format would have to support such disks.
Agreed.
I think the only good reason to invent a new diskimage format would be to hold disk geometries which the previous ones couldn't - and I think Simon just identified it.
Cheers,
Andrew
-- --- Andrew Collier ---- ---- http://www.intensity.org.uk/ --- -- Have you lost your Marbles? http://www.marillion.com/
